The Orphanage (El Orfonato) (2007)
Directed by Juan Antonio Bayone
***SPOILERS***
An homage is a strange beast, and it can be hard to pinpoint in film.
There are entire films hellbent on remaining homages to former films, with
goofy flicks that are normally labeled as spoofs, and films like The Cabin in the Woods and 13 Assassins serving as homages with
their clear-cut references to films within the same genre. And those films,
despite their flaws, are beautiful for their adherence to formula and
tradition, where the sly humor is less tongue-in-cheek and more gracious. But The Orphanage is a strange recreation of
Guillermo del Toro’s The Devil’s Backbone.
Their stories are entirely different, but as far as creepy undead children
roaming the household goes, their styles, shot selection, and subject matter
seem brazenly similar. So yeah, The
Orphanage seems like a homage, but really: is it even an homage at all?
The Orphanage
certainly feels like a pastiche collection of classic films, from Dario Argento
to Roman Polanski to del Toro, who incidentally funded the film and plastered
his name all over the posters and DVD cover. And for as many shots that mimic
Argento’s methodically deliberate and chilling shot selection and the gruesomeness
of Polanki’s The Tenant, The Orphanage feels all-too-similar to del Toro’s The Devil’s Backbone. And
however flattered director Juan Antonio Bayona may have been by del Toro’s
graceful approval, he’d be foolish in believing he’s recreated the genius of del Toro’s body of work—especially The
Devil’s Backbone. In being an homage to his fellow Spanish director and a
tip of the hat to countless pre-1980 exercises in supernatural horror, Bayona’s The Orphanage mistakes stylish puzzles
for substance, providing for an homage that isn’t flattering in the slightest.
Because The Orphanage
owns all the perplexing and confounding twists of a del Toro film (or any other
famous psychological horror film you can probably think of), but none of the
heart or poignancy. The only claim Sergio G. Sánchez’s screenplay can lay about The Orphanage’s connection to del Toro lies in the pure progression of Laura’s (Belén Rueda) mission to find
her son Simón (Roger Príncep). The story goes through the motions, but the
sheer unoriginality of this sequence of events leads to confusion over just how
much time has passed since Simón went missing. There’s a search party; Laura
cries herself to sleep; she and her husband attend a grieving parents meeting;
a medium visits their home and uncovers the ghosts roaming about the orphanage. This rather unadventurous sequence of events
attempts to integrate the underlying trauma and psychological factor of Laura’s
that’s intended to enchant the material—which is Laura’s not-so-mysterious
connection to the haunted orphanage—but there’s never a sense of capturing just
exactly what allows the ghost
orphanage children to subjugate Laura’s bereaved mindset so promptly. An old
woman visits the home to ask questions of her past, but beyond the grotesque
appearance of these children, there’s not a single scene or moment that
actually catapults Laura into such insane territory. Without pathos, the only
horror these children gain are their mere presence, which can be scary, but it’s not good horror
material.
Take The Devil’s
Backbone. The presence of the dead boy owns a physical and symbolic
connection: a bomb that caused the boy’s drowned death lies in the middle of
the courtyard of the orphanage, linking the boy’s past to these characters’
present. Throughout the film there’s an encompassing allude to war, which
becomes all the more horrendous once set against the chilling image of a
pale-white drowned boy whose life was destroyed by such a grotesque practice. A similar attempt is made in The Orphanage, where the filmmakers dedicate scenes to Simón asking
his mother about Peter Pan and the prospect of never growing old. This
discussion is meant to offset Laura’s eventual realization that she put the
nail in Simón’s coffin in her search for him—but it’s resolutely one-note. As
we move through Laura’s search for Simón, there’s no honest attempt to forward
such an underlying theme that seemed much more prevalent in the film’s opening
sequences than during its massive middle treasure hunt, where it disappears and comes back in the end for an unwelcome finale.
The treasure hunt itself is meant to mimic Simón’s similar
treasure hunt, but owns none of the humane connections. Simón’s search for
treasure is an evocation for childlike wonder and escaping imagination, but
Laura’s search is the culmination of several freak encounters and a medium’s
ghostly stroll about the orphanage, abandoning the “troubled past” angle the
film perpetuated while Simón was missing and never providing a link to Simón’s
treasure hunt…other than, you know, it’s another treasure hunt! The lack of
connectivity makes this seemingly del-Toro-rific progression of unearthly events seem less impressive, and altogether empty of compelling drama without an
honest attempt to connect these characters’ psyches. Alongside the slowly
beguiled and troubled mind of Trelkovsky in The
Tenant, The Orphanage comes
across rather childish and gaggingly playful—much like the orphanage children
who come back to haunt Laura.
In what may the worst homage in recent horror memory, the
final scene becomes the culmination and representation of the film’s
intentions, where it pretends to care about any of its characters by giving
them a pretty pathetic sendoff. Trelkovsky's (of The Tenant)
ending is sad, but fitting and proper to his downward spiral. The same can be
said for Suspiria and del Toro’s Pan’s Labyrinth, which comes off as
kind, but treats its characters’ tragic end with the proper human heft that
accompanied the film. The only compliment that can be made to The Orphanage’s closing moments isn’t
its respect of such an ending—since it’s a misplaced respect—but that it keeps
in line with the rest of the film: this doesn’t make any fucking sense. The
capricious nature of the film’s storyline and the dwindling psyches of its
characters is topped with a closing shot of Laura sitting with her dead son and
the orphanage’s former tenants. Bayona slowly backs away from the “moment”
alongside the touching piano score, giving the scene such an inexplicably goofy
aura that it makes it seem as though the filmmakers were playing a joke on us the
entire time. For as Laura cries with her son, it becomes wholesomely clear that
these deformed children shouldn’t even be there, but are there because of their deformities' shock value—every bit as useless as the old woman's face being torn off. Their unintentional
utilization as tragic aberrations owns only a surface-touch to Laura’s past,
lending the scene even more emptiness than comedy. The sad part is: neither was
intentional. Aren’t homages supposed
to be intentional?
Final thoughts:
There are some great shots in this film—despite their
complete and utter lack of substance in regards to the screenplay. Perhaps his
future projects will show more promise. Most notably, his least tame shot in
the film becomes his best, as when Laura taps on the wall (another moment that
mimics an earlier one, but owns no humanistic connection) and the camera reverts
back and forth, slowly revealing more laughably deformed children. Belén Rueda
proves she could be a great horror actress, lending the faux-dramatic moments
an enticing bit of tragedy. But really: this is an adequately performed piece
of trash. It may seem like a legit horror film that recreates Suspiria or The Devil’s Backbone, but upon contemplation, there’s nothing but a
disciplined shot selection to connect these films. The Orphanage may fool viewers with its stamp of approval and large
budget, but even money can’t fix a lack of humane depth, which The Orphanage owns little to none of.
Wow, it's like you saw a totally different film. I don't really see this film as homage in the slightest; just another twist on the haunter house idea. The film, and Laura, interprets the ghosts to be monsters and kidnappers because they are ghosts, not because they do anything actually threatening. They turn out to be the lost creatures who believe they needed a friend, but actually needed a parent. Laura, having been the only character allowed to grow up, dies and becomes that parent to these children who need her.
ReplyDeleteI'm not seeing any of this lack of heart you are. She's raising a child whose fate is almost guaranteed to be nasty from the outset, and through the characters' frustrations that tragic fate comes much too soon. Made aware of the existence of a next life within this house, she makes the ultimate sacrifice to care for her child and her one-time friends, whose horrendous fate she herself escaped by sheer luck.
If anything I think it builds on the excessively clunky and convoluted Devil's Backbone; a film I consider a predictable, beautiful mess.
While I admit the crushed face scene is an unnecessarily needless scare, I think the medium scene is a work of horror genius on a line with The Haunting. Curiously, the medium is played by Geraldine Chaplin, daughter of the great Charlie (and mum of your one out of Game of Thrones).
Unfortunate you didn't enjoy it, but I think you're being very harsh on what it is a film with its own story, no more homage or unoriginal than almost any film made within a pre-existing genre.
Oh, and for the record, calling Mexicans Spanish is like calling Americans British; not so cool.
Clearly we will never agree on this film. So instead of trying to convince one another of whether or not The Orphanage is a good film, I challenge you to a debate. In debate competitions, points are given and taken away based on the amount of supporting evidence and detail each debater presents.
DeleteSo in the regards that you don't think The Orphanage isn an homage (which would hinder my entire review), I present you with a quote straight from director Bayona's mouth from a Washington Times interview, in which he states, "one scene in the film is a direct homage to Poltergeist." And then he goes on to joke with the reporter, offhandedly and nonchalantly relating that, yes indeed, he pays homage to several classic horror films. But hey, maybe Bayona has the wrong definition of homage? Or maybe it's just that you haven't seen The Tenant, which Bayona basically apes during the scene where the old woman's face is torn off. Or maybe you haven't seen Repulsion, which is choreographed almost exactly the same during scenes where Laura stands alone in the house searching for her ghostly friends. Or perhaps you haven't seen The Innocents or The Others, which both feature a brazenly similar storyline featuring a woman with a psychic fixation on dead children. Or maybe you've never seen a single Argento film, such as Phenomena, Deep Red, or Suspiria, which all explore detective stories featuring a deformed child and their psychologically torn mother. And what do all these directors have in common? They own the same graceful, disciplined eye for horror, choosing to fixate on long shots in order to build tension, deviating from the more direct midsection shots featured in blatant horror films, and fixating on the psychological factors more than the blood and gore.
Now surely you've seen all these films, otherwise your argument would seem a bit empty. Especially because I directly mention these films in my review, and your countering of my homage argument would entail you have seen these films and plan on proving exactly how The Orphanage isn't in debt to them. I hate the phrase "ripping off", so I found "homage" to be a much more gracious way of describing Bayona's film. I didn't bother listing all the above examples in my review in the spirit of A) cutting down the length of my reviews, and B) assuming that anyone with even a mediocre knowledge of pre-1980s supernatural horror films would recognize The Orphanage's strangely familiar sequences and themes and narratives, and anyone else would seek out those films if they so choose. Surely you aren't in the latter camp, since you're right here, telling me it's not an homage, that I'm wrong, and that my entire argument is hurt by it, so I am extremely interested for you to educate me (and Bayona) on how (using examples and evidence, since this is a debate, of course) The Orphanage isn't an homage to horror films.
Continued below...
Strangely enough, we do agree on one thing, as I state promptly from the start: The Orphanage isn't an homage. I mean it is...technically, based on everything I just listed above, but our reasoning for whether or not it's an homage differ. "Homage" implies an act of respect, which I'm sure Bayona has for all those films, but The Orphanage itself really doesn't. For as it seems as though it's mimicking many of those aforementioned films, it's missing the traditional gripping imagery that makes the horror genre so great. I say "gripping" because Bayona's imagery is just curt and forceful, but none of it owns the same meaning as those films. For example, that shot The Orphanage mimics from The Tenant? In Roman Polanski's film, the disfigurement relates the horrors the main character feels, which is his ever-anxious fret over his own declining appearance and his transformation of self. You yourself said it was an "unnecessarily needless scare," which I believe pretty much hits home why Bayona doesn't have the same grasp on the horror genre as Roman Polanski or Guillermo del Toro--a man you apparently believe has no grasp over the genre.
DeleteI guess this is where we part, because I watch The Devil's Backbone and I see discipline. All those things you mentioned about The Orphanage? They're true. Laura did misinterpret the ghosts to be monsters. They are lonely children looking for a mother. And while I agree her death is tragic, I don't necessarily agree she "sacrificed" herself, because, er...how would she know to do that? Or maybe it's all in her mind? Regardless, I get it. It's all very touching and heartbreaking and yada yada yada, but only because the screenplay makes it so glaringly obvious. The narrative in this film is spewed through characters' mouths, which, to me, doesn't exactly utilize the horror genre's most intoxicating elements, whereas The Devil's Backbone constantly uses images to link the past story with the present story (such as the bomb) and breathes life into the boy that's haunting the film. The Orphanage has no intention of linking the past and present through images (which I believe is not only a defining aspect of horror films, but also separates film as a beautiful medium in general), but only through hokey, gimmicky sequences that build a false aura around these children for the sake of deceiving the audience, including the children's presence at the party, the medium's visit to the home, and the fact that Simón's relationship with the ghosts really never receives anything more than a glossy, deceptive treatment. So yes, I actually do realize all these things you loved about the film, but I don't find them well executed or, really, all that interesting without the director's instinctual touch. Where del Toro relates the struggles and tortured psyches through his imagery, Bayona is content with characters regurgitating what he wants to relate, coddling the viewer instead of treating them like adults.
And I'll go ahead and end my response the same way you did, addressing the entirely unrelated and inconsequential fact that I called del Toro "Spanish" instead of "Mexican." You say it "is like calling Americans British," but it really isn't at all. It's a mistake I regrettably made, and the power of print marks such a mistake forever, but at that moment in time, I truly believe del Toro heralded from Spain, despite the fact you iterated some form of racism on my part, and that believe that anyone who speaks spanish is Spanish--which I don't. But your blind assumption of this relates that you truly had run out of ways to attack my review, and also displays your gumption to read into material, for The Orphanage treats its characters like puppets, while del Toro will forever be a master of manipulating his surroundings and breathing life into an environment, which in turn translates the struggles of his characters. If you can't see that, then I agree--our views are just too damn antithetical to each other.
DeleteWait, Del Toro isn't Spanish!?!?!?!?!?!?
ReplyDeletei always assumed deltorro was spanish....
ReplyDeleteNeed To Increase Your ClickBank Commissions And Traffic?
ReplyDeleteBannerizer makes it easy for you to promote ClickBank products with banners, simply go to Bannerizer, and grab the banner codes for your selected ClickBank products or use the Universal ClickBank Banner Rotator Tool to promote all of the available ClickBank products.